top of page

Personal Style Is Vanishing - Here’s Why

  • KU-RATED MAGAZINE
  • Nov 18
  • 5 min read

Updated: Nov 21

ree

There is a saying that has been floating around fashion industry for years: if you have a stylist, you do not have personal style. It’s intentionally provocative, occasionally misunderstood, but increasingly relevant in today’s culture. And the truth is, “stylist” no longer refers only to the trained human professional. The new stylists, arguably the most influential stylists in history, are digital: Pinterest moodboards, Instagram outfit wheels, TikTok microtrends, YouTube haul videos, and algorithmic grids that tell you, sometimes several times a day, what you should be wearing.


If you rely on these platforms to guide your aesthetic decisions, you are not shaping your style; you are merely adopting someone else’s. Not because you lack taste or individuality, but because modern fashion culture has conditioned us to outsource our instincts. What once was a slow, personal, intuitive evolution is now a constant copy-and-paste cycle driven by virality.


To understand how we arrived here, and how to reclaim a sense of self, we first need to understand what personal style truly is.

 

The Lost Art Behind Personal Style

People often imagine personal style as a kind of natural gift or a magical ability to “just know” what looks good. But real style, the kind possessed by those we admire for their effortless aesthetic authority, is not instinct alone. It is an understanding built slowly, often unconsciously, through years of trials, errors, risks, and curiosity.


At its root, personal style is an understanding of how the visual world works. It begins with color - how certain colors interact, how saturation affects emotion, and how tone and temperature can shift the mood of a look. It extends into shape, which means not only the structure of a garment but how that shape interacts with the body that wears it. People with style understand how their own proportions move with fabric, how the shoulder line creates attitude, how drape changes depending on posture and gesture.

They understand material, too: how denim softens over time; how wool behaves differently in sunlight; how silk catches the air and how leather settles with wear. They think beyond the surface, considering how two textures will play off each other: matte next to gloss, crisp against fluid, soft beside rigid. They are, whether consciously or not, artists balancing composition and contrast.


This is why personal style has always been intimately tied to art. Creating an outfit is more than putting on clothes; it is constructing a visual composition. Like any artist, someone with personal style considers harmony, tension, movement, proportion, and focal point. They understand that a look is not static but that it shifts as the wearer walks, sits, turns, and interacts with the world. Clothing becomes a moving canvas.


But the true depth of personal style reveals itself in one area most people now overlook: the history behind the garments themselves. Those who dress with intention know why a trench coat has a belt, why shoulder pads came to define power dressing, what makes a blazer double-breasted rather than single, and why certain pockets or lapels exist at all.


They recognize that every garment carries decades (sometimes centuries) of cultural, functional, and design history. Understanding this lineage gives context to personal choices. The trench coat is not merely a coat; it is military innovation. The biker jacket is not simply leather outerwear; it is rebellion stitched into form. Clothing is never just fabric, it is narrative. Which is why people with personal style don’t simply wear clothes. They wear ideas.

 

ree

How We Lost Our Sense of Style

Yet something shifted in the last decade. As social media rose and fashion accelerated into a fast-moving digital current, our relationship with clothing changed. Garments stopped being cherished objects and became disposable cycles. The idea of buying a piece to keep for years feels almost quaint now, overshadowed by the rapid churn of trend-driven content. We no longer think about longevity or emotional resonance.


Instead, we ask ourselves whether the item will photograph well or “fit the aesthetic.”

Where once people asked, Can I style this in multiple ways? Will this still matter to me in five years?We now ask, Is this trending? Do others have it? Will it perform online?


The digital landscape rewards imitation. The more a trend is reproduced, the more it spreads; the more it spreads, the more it convinces us that it’s worth copying. This feedback loop leaves little room for self-discovery. When we buy based on what others are wearing, rather than what we genuinely love, we lose the chance to cultivate our own point of view. In this climate, personal style hasn’t just faded, it has been replaced with collective styling.

 

ree

The Stylist as Tool, Not Identity

This is where the role of the stylist, human or algorithmic, comes into question. Stylists can be invaluable. They can teach, guide, refine. They can help articulate a direction you may already sense but haven’t fully understood. They can introduce you to silhouettes you overlooked or fabrics you underestimated.

What they cannot do, however, is give you personal style. Style is not something that can be handed to you. It is something you build from within.


A stylist can curate an impeccable look, but curation is not the same as identity. Personal style comes from the choices you make when no one is watching, when there is no audience to perform for, when you dress purely for yourself. It comes from experimentation, from learning what resonates, from wearing something in a way no one taught you. Style is practice. It is developed, not delivered.


And this is where the modern dependence on digital inspiration becomes problematic. The algorithm can show you infinite “good outfits,” but it cannot help you build your taste. Taste requires slowing down long enough to ask: Why do I like this? What about it draws me in? How would I interpret this in my own way? Without asking those questions, we only replicate and sadly never create.


ree

Fashion as Storytelling

Fashion has always been bigger than the garments themselves. Designers use fabric, color, shape, and structure to tell stories: cultural, political, aesthetic, deeply personal stories. Clothing reflects the world around it: the mood of a decade, the anxieties of a generation, the optimism of a movement. It carries the fingerprints of its time. To dress with style is to participate in this storytelling.


Reclaiming Personal Style in a Copy-and-Paste Culture

So how do we reclaim something that once came so naturally?

We begin by slowing down, by stepping away from constant inspiration and returning to curiosity. We start paying attention to what we truly respond to emotionally, not what performs well online. We practice wearing the same piece in different ways, building relationships with our clothes rather than treating them as content.


And most importantly, we give ourselves permission to explore without the pressure to imitate. Personal style can only emerge when you allow your instincts room to grow.

Personal style is not about trends, and it cannot be borrowed, copied, or outsourced. It is a slow, ongoing artistic practice, a relationship between you, your body, your history, and the visual world.


ree

Comments


bottom of page